The DSC specs are freely available though. I'm not sure how much information is required by DSC. A line is 133 kHz or 8 µs. A pixel is 533 MHz or 2 ns. AMD and Nvidia don’t support it yet so this is where an adapter would be useful.Īn adapter would work on the pixel level, rather than the frame level so there shouldn't be any lag. New cables will not be enough to test HDMI 2.1. According to , it has 13 ms input lag for 60 Hz game mode. Most of the lag will probably come from the TV instead of an adapter. I don’t know how an adapter will handle other features of HDMI 2.1 such as VRR (maybe convert it to DisplayPort’s Adaptive Sync?) Wikipedia says that for HDM 2.1, DSC is only for resolutions higher than 8K but that doesn’t mean an adapter couldn’t use DSC on the DisplayPort side. VESA describes DSC as a low latency, low complexity codec. There is C source code so you can test it with various images. I’m not sure how much information is required by DSC. Displayport 1.4 is able to put out hence it is able to put out 2.1 is able to match these specifications with and color output on both will be 4:4:4įor indept reading i would like to refere you to VESA and HDMIĬlub3d Cables are certified by these standarts.Īn adapter would work on the pixel level, rather than the frame level so there shouldn’t be any lag.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |